<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Embedding a Flyer in an Active Rain Blog Post (Standard and Premium)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vflyerblog.com/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vflyerblog.com/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/</link>
	<description>The New Face of Classified Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.vflyerblog.com/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/comment-page-1/#comment-56047</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vflyerblog.com/blog/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/#comment-56047</guid>
		<description>I love Activerain, but my problem is the flyers that vflyer produces are two wide for the outside blogs. They can&#039;t be anymore than 640 pixels in width. 

Have you created on for the sole purpose of Activerain users?

Todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Activerain, but my problem is the flyers that vflyer produces are two wide for the outside blogs. They can&#8217;t be anymore than 640 pixels in width. </p>
<p>Have you created on for the sole purpose of Activerain users?</p>
<p>Todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overland Park Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.vflyerblog.com/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/comment-page-1/#comment-20298</link>
		<dc:creator>Overland Park Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vflyerblog.com/blog/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/#comment-20298</guid>
		<description>Iframing your flyers on AR (and other blogs) is not only time saving but helps so that when the home sells, you can just delete the flyer instead of having to go to each of your blogs and network sites and delete the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iframing your flyers on AR (and other blogs) is not only time saving but helps so that when the home sells, you can just delete the flyer instead of having to go to each of your blogs and network sites and delete the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RentalsGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.vflyerblog.com/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/comment-page-1/#comment-20185</link>
		<dc:creator>RentalsGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vflyerblog.com/blog/2008/03/13/embedding-a-flyer-in-an-active-rain-blog-post-standard-and-premium/#comment-20185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested not so much in Active Rain but other blogging (mine are through Wordpress).  With regard to SEO, how does embedding the HTML from vFlyer compare with &quot;hand coding&quot; a listing on your site?  It seems like there&#039;s a lot of extra characters when using the auto-generated HTML which would reduce keyword density quite a bit.  The solution above for Active Rain would essentially be invisible to Google and other&#039;s because of the iFrame, wouldn&#039;t it?  I&#039;m using my blog(s) as a way to generate strong keyword results in search engines...but it seems like these tools my be counter productive in that respect.  Am I wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested not so much in Active Rain but other blogging (mine are through WordPress).  With regard to SEO, how does embedding the HTML from vFlyer compare with &#8220;hand coding&#8221; a listing on your site?  It seems like there&#8217;s a lot of extra characters when using the auto-generated HTML which would reduce keyword density quite a bit.  The solution above for Active Rain would essentially be invisible to Google and other&#8217;s because of the iFrame, wouldn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;m using my blog(s) as a way to generate strong keyword results in search engines&#8230;but it seems like these tools my be counter productive in that respect.  Am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
